The chart below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much
The diagrams above representate the mean of few types of nutritions in meals for breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snacks in USA. It is explained in percentage. Overall, it can be seen in sodium and saturated fat, the highly number owned by foods for dinner while added sugar had the greatly percentage in snacks. On the other hand, the lower mean of nutrients stood at breakfast, added by snacks in sodium.
According to the sodium’s data, nearly half of the chart dominated by dinner, it was 43%, whilst lunch had more than a quarter of the diagram, exactly 29%. The percentage 14% occupied by breakfast and snacks. Next to, saturated fat had the most number in dinner, surely 37% whereas a quarter over one percent reached by lunch. 21% added to snacks and 16%, the modest amount possessed by breakfast. Then in added sugar, the percentage less than 7% to half of the data kept by snacks afterwards 2% to a quarter of the chart saved by dinner. Lunch swept up 19% and breakfast seized 16% as the minor number from all over the quantity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-08 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 11 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-06 | Tosyne | 67 | view |
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations 78
- Water Use in Gulf Countries 2000 78
- The table shows the cost of water in 5 cities in Australia 73
- The charts below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 61
- The maps below represent the development in the Norbiton in the future 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65760869565 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47663347597 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597826086957 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7775673625 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0844452122056 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346588700685 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0258684996785 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705751215559 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133773132795 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.