Male and female olympics participants
The given bar chart provides a comparison of the number of male and female participants in the Olympics between 1924 to 2014.
From an overall perspective, it is evident that the total number of participants in the Olympics saw an increase over the period.
Looking at the chart for more details, at the beginning of the period, the number of male participants was higher than the number of female participants, at precisely 3000 people. Then, it saw an increase from 3000 people in 1924 to around 4500 people in 1954. In addition, the figure for female participants in 1954 was doubled that in 1924, at around 400 people, and 200 people, respectively.
For the rest of the chart, in the period between 1984 and 2014, males experienced an increase in the number of participants, reaching a peak of approximately 6000 people. The number of female participants increased significantly, from nearly 1000 people in 1984 to nearly 5000 people in 2014, and it was lower than the figure of male participants.
- Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people say that to prevent illness and disease governments should focus more on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems 56
- It is much more convenient to watch a movie on television or computer than buying a ticket and going to the cinema In the near future the popularity of cinemas will drastically decline Do you agree or disagree 78
- Comparison of energy production 67
- Annual rice production 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95882352941 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95297047091 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458823529412 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1477828852 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.428571429 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315057912541 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166575304501 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124821482923 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233052268384 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113388544745 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.