It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos …) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
With the exponentially hectic pace of life, this arises a lot of issues related to the environment, particularly a natural process for fauna and flora. Their roles are becoming more and more crucial to our lives than ever. Yet, there are some valid arguments ignoring animal species becoming extinct, I still hold a belief that we should join hands to share accountability in order to save them from the verge of extinction.
It is true that million years ago, there were a vast number of ancient animals brought to the edge of extinction due to the harsh natural conditions. According to recent research, archaeologists have successively discovered fossils such as bones, and teeth associated with ancient animals. Moreover, dating back 65 million years, the history of human beings has proved that the catastrophe of nature wiped out a series of animals, typically dinosaurs, and dodos. Nonetheless, natural effects are just the tip of the iceberg. By that I mean, human activities are the primary cause leading to the disappearance of animals. We play an important role in the chain of ecosystems to balance biodiversity circulation. However, industrial activities have been the devastating natural habitat, chopping down trees on a large scale so as to serve agricultural purposes. Consequently, leading to disturbing the food chain, and damaging animal shelters. In this regard, humans should take responsibility for rectifying this circumstance.
Other justifications for saving wild animals involved their significant roles in directly influencing our lives. It is apparent that everything in nature is connected, as a result, if one of the species dies out, a huge majority of other animals will be affected when the food chain is interrupted. Furthermore, wild animals also create valuable sustain for aesthetics, and in terms of social value. They also make a contribution to various biodiversity that makes our planet a beautiful place. In numerous destinations around the world, many species foster rich cultural customs. For instance, in some religions, cows are revered and worshiped as gods.
In conclusion, the disappearance of many animals does not always occur by the severe weather, but as a consequence of our actions. Therefore, it should be obliged to help preserve wild animals with the aim of doing more wonders for human life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-22 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 80 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | tienallen' | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | tienallen' | 67 | view |
- Some school leavers travel or work for a period of time instead of going directly to the university Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Topic The use of social media e g Facebook and Twitter is replacing face to face contact for many people in everyday life 89
- Young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults Do you agree or disagree 56
- The diagrams show how glass containers such as bottles are produced and recycled 67
- Topic The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 823, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...t, chopping down trees on a large scale so as to serve agricultural purposes. Consequent...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m of doing more wonders for human life.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, as to, for instance, i mean, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1989.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31818181818 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04753840806 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6704865108 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.45 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212901985434 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054191696885 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456546028325 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12701982005 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352019186989 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 823, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...t, chopping down trees on a large scale so as to serve agricultural purposes. Consequent...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m of doing more wonders for human life.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, as to, for instance, i mean, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1989.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31818181818 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04753840806 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6704865108 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.45 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212901985434 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054191696885 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456546028325 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12701982005 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352019186989 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.