The top priority of businesses is making money, and they do not need to have social responsibilities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
One school of thought holds that corporations should focus on generating profits instead of having public responsibilities. While I accept that this perception is somewhat justifiable, I believe that companies are necessitated to serve society.
On the one hand, it is understandable that to grow a business, money is indispensable. Firstly, the cash flow from firms which is extremely abundant could contribute to the development of their countries. This is because of the more taxes are paid by conglomerates, the more opportunities for cutting-edge equipment and high-tech facilities might be invested in by authorities. Secondly, the expansion of remunerative contracts is an undertaking for a stable job market. It can be perfectly explained by the fact that since there is a decrease in the number of bankruptcies, the rates of mass dismissal might no longer be gained, thereby, numerous employees could be able to embark on a steady job.
On the other hand, there is a host of compelling reasons as to why I am convinced that communal obligation is significantly imperative for even the smallest company. The first reason is that enterprises need to be responsible for environmental degradation. Observing the case of Formosa in 2014, a huge number of marine species such as coastal have been on the verge of extinction stem from millions of tonnes of lethal sewage being eliminated to the East Sea, consequently, their production process was put under legal control and its relevant managers had to compensate for their biological indifference. Another reason is that assistance from firms on social issues is considerably fundamental. A prime example is that a prosperous charitable fund was launched by VinGroup last month, facilitating the construction of various unprofitable healthcare centers, educational equipment, and recreational facilities which not only adapting the elemental needs of orphaned children but also the ones who have lived below the poverty line in my nation.
In conclusion, while it is irrefutable that putting a high priority on monetary matters is reasonable, I would contend that taking philanthropic actions on society is essential for corporates.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-02-21 | HaleyLin2000 | 78 | view |
2024-02-21 | HaleyLin2000 | 56 | view |
2023-11-22 | buahkiwienak | 61 | view |
2023-11-22 | buahkiwienak | 61 | view |
2023-11-12 | uyenmia | 84 | view |
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- Humans are damaging the environment What problems can this create What are some solutions 84
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls on noise Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The top priority of businesses is making money and they do not need to have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- The top priority of businesses is making money and they do not need to have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44281524927 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35414138724 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639296187683 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.226510527 49.4020404114 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.769230769 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2307692308 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0615561840002 0.244688304435 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0222892688578 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0251119958366 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0321089338285 0.151304729494 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193860772868 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.