A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum
until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the
claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most
compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Students are like raw clay which can be molded into any desired shapes and sizes. It is the very education and knolwedge, the students gain in schools and college which enable those students to grow up and become a doctor, an engineer, a politician, and possibly a president of a country. The education endowed to the students during their school and college, therefore, is extremely imperative and a nation is obliged to provide the best education to its students by providing a robust curriculum until they enter college. The curriculum ought to be extremely dynamic as to accomodate the need and specialities of all kinds of students -- students have their own unique perceptions and abilities which enables them to learn varieties of skills and knowledge. Therefore, enforcing the same national curriculum for all the students might not be compatible with their talents and abilities which could potentially render them unable to bloom completely in the future.
First, the national curriculum needs to be suited to the variations among students' perception and should be dynamic to be able to incorporate changes as students develop in mind and body. There are as many different minds as there are heads of people; the variabilities amongst students is more so unperceivable. For example, same curriculum for Ariana Grande and Mr. Barack Obama should not exist at all since they had a completely different personalities during their studenthood and hence they developed the way they are able to; one became a renowned singer adored by the nation while the other one became the president of the United States respested by the entire globe. It is necessary to recognize the uniqueness of the students and allow them to develop under a dynamic curriculum which is able to accomodate all of their needs for education and thirst for knowledge.
Even if we consider a national curriculum that is same for all students until they enter college, it is not practical enough to allow the students to develop their career in a way they are able to persue their interests and goals. In current era, there are a lot of opportunities such as youtube, and E-games which are not enlisted in any national curriculum. However, should the students desire to seek a career in these fields, they are pushed into frustration and dilemma by their parents, society and the people. If the national curriculum itself consisted of such opportunities, the students would be able to at least peek into those chances through their window and decide for themselves if they wanted to delve deeper into those possibilities. However, making a same national curriculum completely shuts down those windows and we will never know how would students develop if they had those opportunities without any constraints.
However, same national curriculum also maintains uniformity and allows all the students to gain a common understanding. When we are talking about equality and equity at a higher level, shouldn't the students be able to get the same education despite their differences as well? Enforcing a same national curriculum in all schools will allow the students to be treated equally and provide same opportunities to the students irregardless of their origin, sex, caste, and backgrounds. Same national curriculum would be able to ensure that a student from a remote city in United States is able to learn the same thing as being taught in the best schools throughout the country.
National curriculum, although brings uniformity, if not dynamic enough to meet the uniqueness of students to address their desires, and interests, won't be able to bring out the best from each students. In conclusion, the national curriculum should not be same such that students' unique gifts and talents go unused or unnoticed, but they should be similar to some extent to exercise the notion of uniformity and bestow equal opportunities to all students throughout the nation despite any differences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
- The following appeared in an e mail sent by the marketing director of the Classical Shakespeare Theatre of Bardville Over the past ten years there has been a 20 percent decline in the size of the average audience at Classical Shakespeare Theatre productio 58
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people 66
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 62
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Alta Manufacturing During the past year Alta Manufacturing had 30 percent more on the job accidents than nearby Panoply Industries where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours Experts belie 66
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men an 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... develop in mind and body. There are as many different minds as there are heads of people; the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 186, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... equality and equity at a higher level, shouldnt the students be able to get the same ed...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, as to, at least, for example, in conclusion, such as, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 14.8657303371 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 90.0 58.6224719101 154% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3319.0 2235.4752809 148% => OK
No of words: 646.0 442.535393258 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13777089783 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.0414809386 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85140128902 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.422600619195 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1069.2 704.065955056 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.715800246 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.95 118.986275619 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3 23.4991977007 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.65 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335942229615 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131672744218 0.0831039109588 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537798230808 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226758587372 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183741317176 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 14.1392134831 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 48.8420337079 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 12.1743820225 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 100.480337079 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.