The charts below show the percentage of Australian men and women in three age groups who were employed in 1984, 2001 and 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The two bar chart illustrates the proportion of Australian males and females employed in three age groups: teenagers, adults, and elders in 1984,2001, and 2014.
Overall, the number of Australian teenage men who were employed decreased, the number of adult employees remained the same, and the number of elders increased over 30 years. In the other genders, while the figure for teenagers diminished slightly, the percentage of adults and elders rose gradually from 1984 to 2014.
Initially, 70% of teenage men in Australia were employed in 1984, greater than 10% of the figure for women in the same year. Both these figures for the two genders endured the same in 2001. However, in 2014, while the percentage of 15-19 years old men employed in Australia declined to 50%, the figure for 15-19 years old women decreased slightly to 59%, surpassing the teenage men who were employed at the same time.
In the group of 35-44 age, the proportion of employed teenage men started at nearly 100% in 1984, and this figure continued the same in 2001 and 2014. The figure for teenage women began lower than 40% of the men, then developed and reached approximately 80% over 30 years, lower than 20% than the figure of men. In the elder group, nearly 50% of men were employed in that group and the figure for women was less than five times, just only 10%. Both these figures rose gradually to 60% and 50% over 30 years, respectively. Finally, the proportion of men and women who were employed in the group of 35-44 in Australia was higher than the figure in two other age groups, except in 1984 the teenage women was higher only 1% than the adult.
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than living at home with their parents Do you agree or disagree 67
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is in the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 87
- Some people think environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve Others however think that those problems cannot be solved unless individuals take some action Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others it is a positive or negative development in your opinion 89
- The table below shows the weight of people in a particular country from 1999 to 2009 75
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 286.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75874125874 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37918757613 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.41958041958 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0654546859 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.727272727 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63636363636 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255527216637 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120054645856 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679051242213 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180061079321 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360122811243 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 286.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75874125874 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37918757613 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.41958041958 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0654546859 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.727272727 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63636363636 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255527216637 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120054645856 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679051242213 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180061079321 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360122811243 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.