Some people think that all college students should study whatever they like. Others believe they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion.
Opinions are divided on whether they should study the core subjects like science or technology which can be useful in their future career, whether all the universities or higher education should allow their seniors to learn the subjects that they have passion for. While I acknowledge the logic behind this phenomenon, I am still in favour of the latter.
Those who believe that juniors should be learned the hot subjects which will be helpful for them in the future may have several arguments. First and foremost, with the development of the technology, technology is very essential in people daily life. As a matter of fact, the demand for technological devices is very high, thereby learning this subject can allow seniors to have better job opportunities. Another possible argument is that in recent years, many diseases appear that have adverse effects on human health. As a result, people are trying to find the new measures that can prevent the diseases, so studying scientist can allow juniors to contribute to find the approaches .
Nevertheless, I still believed that university students should be allowed to learn any subjects which they have passion for for several reasons. Chief among these is that with the subjects that they like, they can easily to know the field that they can develop their self. This is because they can have more motivations to study and be more responsible for their choices there by finding the jobs which is most suitable for them to further their careers. The second reason is that with some college students, they are not really good at studying but they can have talent for other fields like sport or painting. Hence, learning science and technology is very hard for them to complete to course since they do not have enough abilities.
In conclusion, it is understandable why some may argue that college students should study core subjects which is essential for them to have stable works. Paradoxically, I would that the view that they should choose to learn the subjects that they actually love.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-10 | tranlequihoang | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | tranlequihoang | 73 | view |
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 84
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 61
- Some people think that all college students should study whatever they like Others believe they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both of these views and give 73
- Companies and private invididuals not government should pay to clean up the pollution that they produced 56
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 682, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ors to contribute to find the approaches . Nevertheless, I still believed that un...
^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: for
...rn any subjects which they have passion for for several reasons. Chief among these is t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, hence, if, may, nevertheless, really, second, so, still, while, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 7.30460921844 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99120234604 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55548195325 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516129032258 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1681469893 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.571428571 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3571428571 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360133077204 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134114924065 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946012543182 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252371342424 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443099994613 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.