The table shows the price of a cup of coffee in six cities from 2010 to 2014 in Australia
The given table gives data for the variation charge of coffee in six cities in 2010 and 2014 in Australia.
Overall, a leveling out was recorded in the cost of a coffee cup in Brisbane, while those in the 5 remaining cities saw upward trends over the course of time. A noteworthy observation is that Sydney was the most expensive place to buy coffee amongst all the listed.
Regarding Sydney, consumers had to pay nearly 3$ for a cup of coffee, two times as high as that in Canberra in 2010. In the following 4 years, there was a gradual increase in both cities, but the figure for the former still was higher than the latter, at 3,17$ and 1,7$ respectively. Nevertheless, people living in Brisbane spent the same money (2.25$) for a cup of coffee during the given period.
In terms of Adelaide and Perth, their figures were at around 2$ for per coffee cup before rising 1,07 times in 2014 as much as in 2010, endingended at 2,1 $. Besides, the most change was seen in Melbourne, the charge was 20% higher from 2.4$ up to 2.9$.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-08 | ililmaidatuz | 80 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | ililmaidatuz | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-06 | mylinh3001 | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-15 | viethung123 | 78 | view |
- The table shows the price of a cup of coffee in six cities from 2010 to 2014 in Australia 78
- Self introduction letter 80
- The data of retail sectors in online platform in term of 4 different items in Canada in the year of 2005 and 2010 are depicted in these charts It is clear that Electronics and appliance were the top preference throughout dedicated years As can be seen fro
- Task 1 The pie chart shows the online sales for retail sectors in Canada in the year 2005 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives information about different types of waste disposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$3'.
Suggestion: $3
...ing Sydney, consumers had to pay nearly 3$ for a cup of coffee, two times as high ...
^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$17'.
Suggestion: $17
... still was higher than the latter, at 3,17$ and 1,7$ respectively. Nevertheless, pe...
^^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$7'.
Suggestion: $7
... higher than the latter, at 3,17$ and 1,7$ respectively. Nevertheless, people livi...
^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$25'.
Suggestion: $25
...ving in Brisbane spent the same money 2.25$ for a cup of coffee during the given pe...
^^^
Line 4, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eriod. In terms of Adelaide and Perth, their figures were at around 2$ for per ...
^^
Line 4, column 63, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$2'.
Suggestion: $2
...nd Perth, their figures were at around 2$ for per coffee cup before rising 1,07 t...
^^
Line 4, column 155, Rule ID: CURRENCY[2]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$1'.
Suggestion: $1
...14 as much as in 2010, endingended at 2,1 $. Besides, the most change was seen in M...
^^^
Line 4, column 241, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$4'.
Suggestion: $4
...ourne, the charge was 20% higher from 2.4$ up to 2.9$.
^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$9'.
Suggestion: $9
...charge was 20% higher from 2.4$ up to 2.9$.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, nevertheless, regarding, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46808510638 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42322266053 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627659574468 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7535044433 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273922975759 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118525664645 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121008765024 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192800359464 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131393079408 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.