The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2050. Units are given in percentages.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The given line graph illustrates your countries, namely France, United States, Japan and Germany in term of the ratio of job age adults between 1960 to 2050.
What stands out from the line graph is that there were two opposite trends for there 4 figures. While the proportion of the United States of working ages will reach a plateau, people whose working ages from the France, Japan, Germany will decline dramatically.
Looking at the graph for more details, starting at a quiet high point, the percentage of working ages people who from Japan and Germany reached the vertex to 70% after soaring significantly from 1960 to 1990. There was a remarkable jumped of more than two- thirds in the ratio of working group age of France and United States between 1960 to 1990.
Turning into the down trend of the other two, it is predicted that the ratio of Japan will get the lowest point to 50% from 2000 to 2050. Over the period of prediction, the rate of France and Germany will decline remarkable between 55% and 60% from 2000 to 2050. It is predicted that the United States will see a period of stability from 1960 to 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | htngyen | view | |
| 2023-07-26 | htngyen | view | |
| 2023-03-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 78
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now
- The graph shows the average Japanese month salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white televisions and color televisions during the same period 73
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 71
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.645 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26516555686 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1885254604 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.125 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2055142715 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972362749393 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473625964626 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136601880607 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290128322519 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.