Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person.
Why do you think this is the case?
What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person?
Concerning the issue of socialising online, it is widely believed that instead of a face-to-face meeting with another, many adolescents choose to meet other persons in the cyber environment. Personally, some of the most common causes will be analyzed in this writing, followed by several responsible solutions.
The discussion can be started with a look into the potential causes of this issue. First of all, one of the main causes is the convenience of technology nowadays. This is due to the fact that thanks to the social networks, people can get access to everyone by using the video calls and meet others at their own homes easily. Second of all, the more serious reason in this case is that the wide spread of COVID 19 pandemic prevent us from meeting face-to-face with others. The main basic is probably because the Internet is the best environment for people to meet others without being infected in this desease.
Actually, there are some solutions to tackle this problem. The first possible way is to organize some social clubs and celebrate various contests monthly for people to attend in. Taking on the second problem, the most successful way to confront this would be for the authorities to encourage people go out for face-to-face meetings by creating several festivals or events throughout the year.
Taking everything into account, people have to weigh up in their thoughts to what extent this issue should be supported. However, the discussions are convincing enough to lead me to draw a conclusion that people's relationship would be better and better if they spent certain time on meeting another in person
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 61
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones 61
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, look, second, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03333333333 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70045720866 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596296296296 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8423475984 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.25 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202484861797 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700173547177 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041201528888 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122779468121 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357222874116 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.