There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays?
Music has evolved through generations into various types and genres. From my perspective, it has become a vital part of every human culture for many reasons, and traditional and international music, two different kinds of music, are equally essential to the general development of music.
One of the functions of music that meet human needs is emotional healing and enrichment. A singer communicates with his listeners through his music works since a song may be an untold heartbreaking story through which he needs empathy or the expression of sympathy he shows toward those unfortunate in a particular aspect of life. Thanks to this communication, music lovers could feel more comforted when someone understands themselves and sympathize more with the artist or the unluckier lives. In addition, music, which tends to be regarded as literature without melody, can satisfy people with its educational values as a song can convey priceless lessons to listeners. Those lessons can be about how they should treat people, how they value themselves and life, or maybe about cultural and historical values they need to be aware of to preserve for future generations.
In my viewpoint, it may be hard to define whether traditional or international music is more vital since both are crucial to the development of music in any country around the world. To be more specific, each type reflects and plays a different role in the music of a nation. Traditional genres, such as Ca Tru and Quan Ho in Viet Nam, express the country's culture, customs and history, connecting us to the past and forming part of our cultural essence. Exposure to them would boost people's acknowledgement of their origin and broaden their cultural horizons. By contrast, international music, which is popular and widely listened to, glues cultures together. Having a catchy melody and deep lyrics, it is the universal voice of many music lovers, linking them into a whole called "the world". Thus, traditional and international music should not be valued differently as they are mutually supportive: one unites culture with the others, and one gives it a unique identity and differentiates it from the rest.
In conclusion, music is a necessary part of human existence, and I believe both traditional and international music are worth gaining equal appreciation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-24 | Roy An | 95 | view |
| 2023-11-24 | Roy An | 95 | view |
| 2023-11-17 | Tosyne | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | hieu13092006 | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Hypnogogic | 61 | view |
- In some countries many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think this is a positive or negative development 77
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 90
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 90
- Some people say that men are naturally more competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sports or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views an 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21220159151 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99135571629 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570291777188 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.9557076321 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1333333333 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405147664687 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155094330854 0.084324248473 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099977689668 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287113844061 0.151304729494 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824489927035 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.