While many people go to university for academic study, more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, in many universities have many people study for academic. However, some people believe that students should do vocational training because have a problem about decreased qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers. I agree with this argument and this essay will support with this argument.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of people need to study vocational training. First,government subsidies for higher education are believed to equalize educational opportunities among and decide study vocational training. Students can choose any part for themselves regardless of their background. This vocational training support, presumably, tends not only to increase the overall career rate but also to mitigate their feeling of inferiority, which eventually promotes an egalitarian society. Second, students study vocational training would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and knowledgeable human capital is imperative to foster the economic growth and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problem would be far more significant than the minor benefits once have many students study vocational training. First, people think that students should do vocational training would likely correspond with a tremendous financial strain on a country. Generating no income from tuition and fees, university would become over-reliant on the state budget, meaning that, there would Le less input to develop other important areas such as healthcare system or transport infrastructure. Second, there are trend going to study vocational training would tempt many young people including those who are not inclined or show no interest in college pursuit, thereby adding great burdens for training admissions and enrollment staff and potentially wasting time that these young people could have spent pursuing more suitable academic paths. It, instead, would be a more suitable academic for students if the resources focus on supporting privileged yet gifted students or have a passion to that training.
In conclusion, although have many advantages for students also have many disadvantages. In my perspective, I disagree with this argument and government needs have a good solution if have many students choosing that but not college.
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 67
- Today family members do not eat meals together Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- Around the world some adults work from home as technology becomes cheaperand more accessible Technology is an important part of modern life From my perspective both happenings are and I will explain more in this essay 56
- The maps illustrate the centre in small town build and planned development Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 96, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , government
...need to study vocational training. First,government subsidies for higher education are beli...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'trends'?
Suggestion: trends
...sport infrastructure. Second, there are trend going to study vocational training woul...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77620396601 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98083233519 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592067988669 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.1834611544 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.4375 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325181027 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109152091132 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915430495536 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198030617992 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101433435314 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.