The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare 4 different countries, namely India, Sweden, Morocco, and Viet Nam in terms of three sources which were used to produce electricity from 2003 to 2008.
Overall, it is clear that Viet Nam and Morocco did not use nuclear power. In addition, while fossil fuel was the largest source of electricity supply in Viet Nam and India, it was used with a very small number in two other countries.
In Morocco, hydro power occupied a very large majority of electricity production at 95% which was the highest proportion compared with three other countries. Meanwhile, people used fossil fuel rarely with low percentage, at 5%. In Viet Nam, hydro power accounted for 44%, and this figure was similar for fossil fuel, at 56 %.
Fossil fuel was a source which contributed quanity of electricity for India with the largest percentage, at 82%. By contrast, in Sweden, it was used with the smallest proportion, at 4%. Between 2003 and 2008, hydro power and nuclear power were two main supplies for Sweden, at 52 % and 44 % respectively. In India, this figures were quite low, at 14% for hydro power and only 4% for nuclear power.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-19 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-19 | nobitaa | view | |
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
- The table and chart below show the domestic water use and cost in 5 countries 67
- The Graph Below Shows The Average Number Of Vietnamese Students Studying In France America And Russia Between 2000 And 2015 67
- Pop stars earn much more than classical music performers Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 11
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 15 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually put before the verb 'fuel'.
Suggestion: rarely fuel
...ountries. Meanwhile, people used fossil fuel rarely with low percentage, at 5%. In Viet Nam...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86082474227 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54433744197 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541237113402 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 3.36585365854 386% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8586489172 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.090027774556 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433999550382 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573474291593 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0756687742916 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606276414458 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.