Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
One of the most important questions for people after graduation, wheter from undergradute school or from university, is how should they choose their future career. Individuals who are seeking for a job may confront a wide variety of choices based on their expertise or their interests, thus, it would be a difficult process choosing the field that will be matched with their profiles. Although, there are more differences between now and the past in case of the ways of identification of a suitable job, it is my firm belief that it was easier to find the career that would probably will build you a better future. Thinking about this, different reasons come to my mind, and I will develope these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, jobs had more specific tasks in the past. Nowadays, this is nearly impossible to find a job which tasks are specifically defined. Interdisciplinary working is on the most -if not the most- popular trends among the clients these days and this trend make the career opportunities more ambigues. Not only it is hard for job seekers to match their profiles with the requirements, but it is hard for them to imagine a clear future. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience when I graduated from the unisversity in the field of architecture. I was nearly impossible to find a job that would be matched with my porfile and that was because of multidisciplinary requirments of those offers. This problem not only make it harder to find a career, but it also make it difficult to picture a shaped future.
Furthermore, living in the era of information sometimes makes it difficult to choose between tons of accessible options. This difficulty is also applicable to job seeking process, thus, it could be difficult for people to identify the best choice for their career. Drawing from my own experience, finding a fit field for working could be as hard as finding suitable hair shampoo in a store with thousands of different brands. The actual needs and criterias will be faded among the volume of datas that people will face. Consequently, the chance of choosing the right field will be nearly zero.
In light of the reasons mentioned, although there are always some exceptions which are excluded from a general rule, I strongly believe that finding appropriate career which can bring life security and happiness in the future was easier earlier rather than today.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Telephone has greater influence on people s lives than television has 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 833, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...it harder to find a career, but it also make it difficult to picture a shaped future...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9119047619 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82539805154 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.315558828 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.352941176 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7058823529 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11764705882 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156305217426 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549016777302 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532217130218 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102448171416 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371008747365 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.