Some people feel that cities should allow for spaces for graffiti while others feel it should be banned. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion. (sample cue card)
Graffiti has been a controversial topic for many years, with some people believing that it is a form of art that should be allowed in cities, while others think that it should be banned. This essay will examine both sides of the argument and provide a personal opinion.
On the one hand, some people argue that graffiti is a form of artistic expression and should be allowed in cities. They believe that graffiti adds character to the urban landscape and can be used to convey important social or political messages. Furthermore, they argue that by allowing graffiti, cities can create designated areas where artists can create murals and other large-scale pieces, which can help to reduce vandalism in other areas.
On the other hand, opponents of graffiti argue that it is a form of vandalism and should be banned in cities. They believe that it is a blight on the urban landscape and can be costly to remove. Furthermore, they argue that graffiti can be used by gangs to mark their territory, which can be intimidating to residents and visitors alike. Finally, they argue that allowing graffiti can lead to a slippery slope, where other forms of illegal activity are tolerated or even encouraged. In my opinion, while graffiti can be a beautiful form of art, it should not be allowed in cities without proper regulation. City governments should create designated areas for graffiti artists, where they can create their work without fear of legal repercussions. However, graffiti outside of these designated areas should be banned and those caught should be fined or forced to clean up their work.
In conclusion, the debate over whether or not cities should allow for spaces for graffiti is ongoing. While there are valid arguments on both sides, it is important for cities to find a balance between artistic expression and protecting public property.
- International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages 67
- The chart below shows the numbers of male and female research students studying six science related subjects at a UK university in 2009
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the stone age One was made 1 4 million years ago and the other was made 800 thousand years ago viewing from the back view front view and side view Summarize the information by selecting and repor 100
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 61
- The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...oth sides of the argument and provide a personal opinion. On the one hand, some people argue t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 32, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... work. In conclusion, the debate over whether or not cities should allow for spaces for graf...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, if, so, while, as for, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63340424129 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474193548387 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3274067084 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351975796955 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151444434391 0.084324248473 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932880721451 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259948646944 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657095519844 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.