In the future, there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries. Is it a positive or negative development?
With the prosperity of modern society, people today are experiencing the highest standards in every aspect of life, living up to their expectations. In fact, thanks to the thriving of cutting-edge technology, human life expectancy has been more prolonged than ever before, leading to making up a higher percentage of the old in numerous nations. I contend that this status may do more harm than good for society as a whole, and this essay will shed light on more details about this trend.
One major ground effect behind the rising of retired workers is that those people may place an incredibly tremendous burden on society. By that I mean, if more and more older citizens, this would ensure rapid depletion of both social security funds and strained financial sources available. Obviously, retired elderly people often have no access to any source of income, and their expenses would culminate into quite a formidable figure. By this as it may, the government has to account responsibility to take care of them and sponsor them for the rest of their lives in terms of their contributions to the community. Therefore, if older people account for a huge ratio of the population, the authority has to raise more funds for them instead of investing in other areas, such as education or economic development. In a long term, countries’ economy is fallen into stagnation and crisis.
Another detrimental effect is the growth in the number of elderly people is likely to damage the national workforce. Since they are not strong enough to assure the pressure tons of workload, they may not be able to accomplish tasks efficiently, thereby not making a considerable contribution to the economy. Consequently, the number of young employees is not enough so as to take charge of older positions. A shrinking workforce can impede economic growth which in turn can halt meaningful strides toward better standards of living.
To give an example, in the case of blue-collar jobs, staff who are much older cannot work productively as younger ones since they lack the strength to tackle problems and give logical decision-making. Hence, they are more likely to be laid off which may practically diminish the national workforce in this area.
In conclusion, the expansion number of older people in comparison to younger people is definitely having a negative impact on the development of the economy since it will place a massive burden on the state budget and reduce the productivity of the labor force.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-28 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-03 | tieuquynh | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | Charles Le | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | DNTMdntm | 89 | view |
| 2022-04-22 | vanhyeet | 61 | view |
- Society is based on rules and laws It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The table shows the income and expenditure of Brooklyn Hall the building used to hire in over the period of three years 84
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel Do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- The chart shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000 84
- Some people think the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment while others think that the main benefits are in the world business Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'older' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: older
...on society. By that I mean, if more and more older citizens, this would ensure rapid deple...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...number of young employees is not enough so as to take charge of older positions. A shrin...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, may, so, therefore, as to, i mean, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2090.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 413.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06053268765 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8407293142 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566585956416 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.728777523 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.625 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8125 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204143275863 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058169907316 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521057545437 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110573102791 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653237892044 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.