Some people think that zoos are cruel and all the zoos should be closed. However, other people think that zoos are useful to protect the rare animals. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Currently, with mushrooming human population and their need, wild habitats are facing grim situation as a result to shelter these animals they are being kept at zoos. But it has become a hot topic whether the zoos should be closed as it seems intensive cruel or encouraged more in order to protect rare animals. It is true that people from different backgrounds may have divergent attitude toward this issue. This essay discusses both views before coming to empirical conclusion.
On the one hand, it is understandable that caging animals in zoo is brutal and therefore it should be abandoned for some reasons. The first and foremost is that keeping animals in captivity is unethical. Regard to the human’s dominating kind on the planet but still have no right to use animals for entertainment. Moreover, zoo exhibit animals with the aim of making profit. Therefore, It turns out that such animals will be caged underprivileged conditions, for the long-term, they will lose their instinct to hunt food or even died. According to some report, for instance, many animals die in zoos due to unfavorable climate conditions or emotional shock.
On the other hand, there are still positive impacts of protecting endangered species. At first, zoos are artificial environment that are made by people for wild animals, especially for those at the verge of extinction such as pandas or rhinos. This also allows scientists to study animal behavior. Another consideration of zoos is that they employ numerous people, therefore providing job opportunities and income for local residents. Also, the money that zoo make can used for conservation projects.
To recapitulate, both sides are well-grounded. Although zoo plays an important role in wildlife conservation, I would argue that government should take serious steps in order to provide more realistic environment resembling with their natural environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-03 | ratunugraheni | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | ratunugraheni | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | ratunugraheni | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | ratunugraheni | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | ratunugraheni | 67 | view |
- Nowadays people always throw the old things away when they buy new things some people claim that the broken things should be repaired and used again What factors cause this phenomenon What effects the phenomenon leads to 56
- People s shopping habits depend more on the age group they belong to than any other factors Do you agree or disagree 89
- Discuss your opinion on how modernism can affect our health What can the government do to overcome such situations 67
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods While others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reaso 72
- A tendency that the news reported in the media focuses on problems and emergencies rather than the positive developments is harmful to both the individual and the society Do you agree or disagree with this statement 71
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30794701987 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95612293011 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645695364238 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5954832948 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2941176471 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301063040144 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882753764794 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563610979957 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166079576325 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496345638451 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30794701987 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95612293011 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645695364238 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5954832948 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2941176471 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301063040144 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882753764794 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563610979957 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166079576325 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496345638451 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.