People’s character is influenced by environment rather than genetics. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Several arguments supposed that the personality of individuals is affected profoundly by their relative genes. While it is true to some extent, I still believe that it is simultaneously impacted by the social environment.
It is obviously true that generations are the major element affecting a human’s character. To begin with, parents are the earlier teachers who educate their offspring before they study in educational institutions. Indeed, it can be seen that there are several old-traditional families, for example, who have their own discrete temperaments which are transmitted from generation to generation and the parents’ behaviors and attitudes will be imitated by their children when they were born. Therefore, it is easy to comprehend that the previous personalities of people are startingly accomplished and grew up year by year, and it will be extremely difficult to ameliorate these characteristics unless their family changes.
Nevertheless, there is a considerable factor determining people’s demeanors which is the environment of the community. There is no denying that social media are enhancing dramatically that allow people to access the latest information and affecting individuals’ personalities following to easiest way. To illustrate, videos and photographs possess violent and sensitive content that is spreading on social networking sites which can influence the young generation as they are still in the upgrading ages and have not had experiences analyzing right from wrong of this supported information. That can cause result in building the worst social characteristics in them and a threat to society.
In conclusion, people’s character can be greatly affected by heredity. However, I am still supposing that environment is a contributing factor to human personality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- Some people think goverments should spend mowney on measures to save languages with few speaker form duying out completely Others think that this is a waste of financial resources Discuss these both views and give your opinion 78
- In order to learn a language well we should also learn about the country as well as the cultures and lifestyles of the people who speak it To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree You should write at lea 89
- The rise of social media platforms has made it easier for people to vent their frustrations and complaints publicly What is the consequence of this trend Is there any benefit to expressing complaints on social media 67
- Some people fail in school but end up being successful in life why do you think that is the case What is the most important thing to succeed 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the easiest'.
Suggestion: to the easiest
...ng individuals’ personalities following to easiest way. To illustrate, videos and photogra...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 82, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...reatly affected by heredity. However, I am still supposing that environment is a contributing fact...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72962962963 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38662948361 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596296296296 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.3522920623 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.916666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0790250048885 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332946391119 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374776394629 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0570798065523 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038229988096 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.