The bar shows the percentage of people going to the cinema in one European country on different days

Essay topics:

The bar shows the percentage of people going to the cinema in one European country on different days.

The graphs demonstrate the percent of buses that served on time, both in reality and the company goals during the period 1999 to 2003. And the average number of complaints every a thousand customers.

Overall, the percentage of expected on time services tend to be higher than in the real life, and the standard is drop through years. While the number of complaints have an increased trend year by year.

In 1999 and 2000, the company on time target were the highest at 86% which is different in real life at 85% in 1999 and remarkable low in 2000 at 82%. In the next 2 years, in 2001 and 2002, they standardized on time services rate at 85% and the actual numbers were close to what have been expected, just lower by half to one percent. The goal is lowered by half percent the following year which is the only year that the actual percent have passed what is expected. On the other hand, the number of complaints were risen, from 70 to 100 passengers in the year of 2000. It dropped a bit in 2001 and started to increased gradually from over 80 cases to 120 cases in 2003

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-21 linhdk35 78 view
2024-10-04 brew 67 view
2023-08-29 chau hoang 73 view
2023-06-24 Ánh Kim 78 view
2023-06-15 dojo 89 view
Essays by user TLan168 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...and the standard is drop through years. While the number of complaints have an increa...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31309316717 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2137004291 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7777777778 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0302095313338 0.215688989381 14% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0112776218995 0.103423049105 11% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0162421843797 0.0843802449381 19% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0190753561521 0.15604864568 12% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136197928358 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.