Some people think that childcare centers provide the best services for children of preschool age. Other working parents think that family members such as grandparents will be better carers for their kids. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
While some parents claim that childcare centers are optimal places for the pre-schooling age, others believe that kith and kin care is more conducive to the offspring's comprehensive development. From my perspective, I agree with the former.
On the one hand, there is no denying that relative caretakers can provide certain noteworthy benefits. One of the most discernible advantages is to cement in-home relationships. Irrefutably, there is an intangible and unprecedentedly strong bond among family members, which is in some cases synonymous with the fact that nannies, such as grandparents, typically provide their grandchild with dedicated and exceptional treats, hence proportionately allocating a considerable proportion of their time to communicate and supervise infants and toddlers. As a result, this would effectively bolster the family's strong bond.
On the other hand, it is undeniable that child nurses in centers are of great benefit to preschoolers' intellectual and physical development. The first significant advantage is high-quality childcare services. Indubitably, not only do the childcare businesses constantly equip innovative and comfortable caring facilities, but they also usually employ high-qualified and competent educators and babysitters; therefore, infants and toddlers are accessible to effective care services and comprehensive educational curriculums, proportionately acting as catalysts for children to acquire essential and valuable knowledge and skills such as problem-solving, conflict resolution, and teamwork. Another tangible advantage is understanding children's daily scheduled structures and routines. Indeed, infants or toddlers likely have different physical and mental healthcare demands, which in turn require high-qualified professionals and specialists to research and build appropriate age-group timelines for eating, sleeping, and entertaining; therefore, this might gradually establish positive habits and healthy lifestyles for children.
In conclusion, while some parents claim that utilizing family members for caring for their offspring is advantageous to a certain degree, I espouse the notion that center-based childcare services are more conducive to the physical and mental comprehensive children's development based on the aforementioned reasons.
- The maps show the changes of an office building between the present and the future 73
- More and more people want to buy clothes cars and other products from well known brands What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative trend 24 02 2019 78
- The price of 800 grams of four kinds of bread in a particular European country 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in an European country betwwwn 1999 to 2004 78
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 716, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...nd teamwork. Another tangible advantage is understanding childrens daily scheduled structures an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.3164556962 5.12529762239 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47377844383 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629746835443 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 141.14531519 49.4020404114 286% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 166.333333333 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232514074171 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690491618445 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634667528625 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144696663453 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487691450808 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.5 13.0946893788 164% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 11.25 50.2224549098 22% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.2 11.3001002004 161% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.67 12.4159519038 158% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.27 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 716, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...nd teamwork. Another tangible advantage is understanding childrens daily scheduled structures an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.3164556962 5.12529762239 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47377844383 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629746835443 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 141.14531519 49.4020404114 286% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 166.333333333 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232514074171 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690491618445 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634667528625 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144696663453 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487691450808 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.5 13.0946893788 164% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 11.25 50.2224549098 22% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.2 11.3001002004 161% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.67 12.4159519038 158% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.27 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.