the plans below show how a ground floor of particular building has changed over time
The plans given depict the modernisation of the ground storey of a specific building.
It is clear from the pictures that the floor has undergone some noticiable transformations. Additionally, the function of this place has been changed 3 times since 1958.
From 1958 to 1984, when the floor was used as an office, visitors could enter it through a gate located in the southern area. At the same time, to the left of the storey, a manager office was flanked by a kitchen to the north and a reception area to the south, while assistant’s office and secretary’s office were opposite the manager one. Likewise, there were a meeting room and a toilet situated in the northwest and southwest corner in turn.
Between 1985 and 2000, the floor was used as an apartment. The locations of the kitchen and the entrance remained unchanged, whereas bedroom 1 and bedroom 2 had been erected in the position where the manager office and reception used to be. In contrast, there was a living room relative to the disappearance of the meeting room and assistant’s office. Conversely, the secretary’s office and the toilet had been demolished to give way to a bathroom and shower.
Up to now, the storey has been coverted into a boutique. While the entrance and the kitcheen remain unchanged, more places for flower have been added. By contrast, a play area and a gift cards have been constructed in the southwest and northwest corner respectively. Meanwhile, bedroom 1 has been transformed into an office.
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The map below show the information about the change of Riverage college 30 years ago and now 67
- Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society 78
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The figures bolow compare the number of internet users in several European nation as well as the prevalence of online shopping in these countries 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, likewise, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92913385827 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91105461104 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511811023622 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 381.6 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1724357675 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4285714286 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.09268292683 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0767836845176 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296147287497 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412978198192 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0612356202893 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519497384612 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, likewise, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92913385827 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91105461104 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511811023622 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 381.6 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1724357675 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4285714286 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.09268292683 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0767836845176 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296147287497 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412978198192 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0612356202893 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519497384612 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.