The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
As is illustrated by the chart, different types of transportation are used by travellers throughout the period (1960, 1980, and 2000). It is measured by percentage of total travellers.
Overall, bike and foot mode are slightly different from each other during the above mentioned period, while car and bus usage is higher than other transportation.
In addition, the proportion of cars is rose up from a small minority (5%) to slightly more than a third (35%) during the period from 1980 to 2000, and reached its peak in 2000 accounted to less than two fifths (37%). Also, around less than a fifth (18%) of travellers used bus in 1980, outnumbered the usage of bus went up to a quarter (25%) in 1980. In contrast, the usage dipped to less than a fifth (15%) in 2000.
Besides, the figure for using bike in 1960, 1980 was slightly different by accounting for (a quarter, a fifth respectively), then it slumped to a small minority around (5%) in 2000. Moreover, the number of foot walking hit the highest point by more than a third in 1960, while it went down from less than a fifth to approximately around one in ten throughout the period from 1980 to 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-03 | tata | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | tata | view | |
| 2021-04-25 | Poinsettia03 | 81 | view |
| 2021-04-25 | Poinsettia03 | 81 | view |
| 2021-02-05 | RazzaqovAmir | 71 | view |
- In your opinion should young people choose their profession or should their parents choose for them 61
- Many criminals commit further crimes as soon as they are released from prison What do you think are the causes of this What effects will this have on society 56
- The graphs below show unemployment rates and average earnings according to level of education Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram shows the process of making leather products 61
- The charts below give information on UK spending habits for books bought over the internet Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
As is illustrated by the chart, differen...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, moreover, so, then, third, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70040427053 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487804878049 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4535207051 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.875 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196279668563 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101594835334 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828202281787 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143307810823 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065854166644 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.