The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart demonstrates the total volumn of Male and Female participating in higher education, both part-time and full-time study schedule, from 1970/71 to 1990/91
Depicted from an overview perspective, the number of people participating in full-time education increased gradually in the given period. Another thing to point out is that the number of Woman entered further education surpassed the number of Man in 1990/91.
Take a closer look at the full-time male participants number, a rise from 100.000 people in 1970/71 to 220.000 people in 1990/91 could be witnessed. Following the same trend, the total number of female full-time students also saw an increase of 170.000 people, from 60.000 to 230.000 in the time range 1970/71 to 1990/91. The awareness of the importance of further education throughout the years were a crucial explanation for this trend.
In the year 1990/91, the total number of female student in higher education achieved 1.330.000 people, with the amount of part-time female participant reaching a peak of 1.100.000. On the other hand, the number of Male participating in higher education in 1990/91 were only 1.230.000, 100.000 less than the Female number, indicating that higher education has become a more common thing than it was in the past, especially for woman.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | fdsugb22 | view | |
| 2023-07-06 | Selena17_ | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-13 | ntqkhai | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-26 | kashyap sahil | view | |
| 2022-09-28 | devanshgera8@gmail.com | view |
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram shows the small scale production of smoked fish 84
- The graph below shows a survey result of 4000 participants who expressed what important aspects they have learned from the internship they have completed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 11
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table below shows information about three different types of restaurants Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, so, another thing, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34951456311 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82298979335 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529126213592 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.1710087761 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.428571429 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4285714286 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191257513995 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109000336157 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048767539883 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148478280769 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340191272329 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.2329268293 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.