Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that advertisements either supply audience with amusement or irritation, and the marketing instrument do not effect shoppers anymore. I mostly agree with the notion as the role of advertisement has been downplayed due to a paucity of creativity and manipulation of some ads.
Many of advertisements to mislead users or exaggerate about the actual impacts of products and services. They attempt to seduce people into impulsive buying behaviors, rather than provide necessary information for buyers making their purchases. People thus start to develop prejudices agaisnt advertised offerings and have a tendency to avoid overhyped offerings that are associated with the marketed products altogether. Another downside of advertisements is that they tend to be repetitive. So irresponsible some advertising agencies are that they are countinually milk monotonous patterns of adverts. The approach which has already become obsolete in the marketing world not only shackles the creativity of maketers but erodes the brand images in customers’ minds.
Admittedly, there are some innovating advertising campaigns that held target customers in awe while smoothly delivering the messages to them. The ads of Nike, a footware giant is a prime example. The company has skillfully utilized Michael Jordan to endorse for basketball shoes, which raise its brand awareness and reap numerous benefits. However, such ground-breaking approaches are not common these days, hindering the implications that advertising has upon shopping habits.
In sum, I somewhat agree with the view that influences of advertisement have on buyers are jeopardized. Deception and repetition contribute largely to the phenomenon, even though few campaigns can be successful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-15 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-14 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-14 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-14 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-20 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
- As transport and accommodation problems are increasing in many cities governments are encouraging businesses to move to rural areas Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- More and more people decide to eat healthy food and exercise regularly What are the reasons for this trend What can be done to encourage more people to eat healthier and exercise 78
- It is often argued that it is difficult to get children to read Why do you think this is What measures could be taken to encourage children to read more Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
- Government should support care vs finance for retired people while others believe that they should save money when they get older Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones Which types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...on, and the marketing instrument do not effect shoppers anymore. I mostly agree with t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76923076923 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19564237322 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665384615385 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3209500808 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.142857143 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.07142857143 7.06120827912 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21919287239 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667471996418 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531525995746 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11271228511 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422831918349 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.