The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagrams given illustrate the evolution of the horse, especially in terms of the foot structure, over a 40-million-year period.
It is evident from the pictures that there are four main stages shown. Additionally, the development commences with Eohippus and culminates with the modern horse.
Approximately 40 years ago, the horse was known as Eohippus, whose size was quite small, and it had a foot structure emcompassing four digits. About 30 million years ago, at which time the horse was called Mesohippus, its structure of foot exhibited 3 toes. Besides that, the most noticeable transformation was that Mesohippus was bigger compared to Eohippus.
The development continues with the stage called Merychippus, which happened around 15 million years ago. While the size of Merychippus and the number of its toes did not undergo any significant change, the foot structure was divided into segments. Likewise, the middile toe became larger, which rendered it more prominent. Currently, it is recorded that the size of modern horse has developed bigger and it has more fur on its head, accompanied by a foot structure composed of only one large digit.
- The figures bolow compare the number of internet users in several European nation as well as the prevalence of online shopping in these countries 78
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interested in certain sports 84
- The plans below show a small theatre In 2010 and the same theatre in 2012 73
- The diagram below shows how the orange juice is produced 73
- The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the UK and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, likewise, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28108108108 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9514404501 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637837837838 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4807877919 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151295766991 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629967884295 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063921641224 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107457357909 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664692358267 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.