More and more measures to improve the security in the large area in the urban areas have been introduced because of the increased crime.
Do the benefits of these measure outweighs the drawbacks
With the rapid development of modern society, safety has become one of the most important concerns. For that reason, a variety of methods have been introduced widely to raise guarantee levels in developed cities on many continents. In addition, they have been introduced to reduce the proportion of crime. Despite several setbacks, I believe this phenomenon offers numerous advantages. This passage will discuss the both view .
Many individuals claim that security should be more considerable in large cities to ensure the safety of the dwellers . It is mainly due to the possibility that a person may be injured when violent criminal behavior happens. If an area is equipped with enough facilities to meet the security needs of the residents, it is hard to commit the crime as the criminal may be afraid of being detected or heavily fined . Bien Hoa city-one of the areas, agrees to install cameras and emergency bells in many neighbourhoods , which help to reduce robbery proportions nowadays . An area with stable security, on the other hand, can develop a strong economy by attracting numerous people to settle and work there.
On the contrary, a couple of incidents were provided to prove that security limits living freedom. As a consequence of the installation of facilities such as cameras to monitor a specific area, many people are concerned that strangers can observe their own lives every time.
From my perspective, I believe that methods of security improvement provide plenty of benefits as it protect proverty as well as individuals’ mental and physical health.
In conclusion, despite a couple of setbacks, ideas that increase security give more benefits than its drawbacks.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The charts below show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison
- The table below shows the number of motor vehicles per 1 000 inhabitants in eight countries in 1990 and 2000
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The table below shows key data on the demographics of four different countries
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 426, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... This passage will discuss the both view . Many individuals claim that security...
^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ies to ensure the safety of the dwellers . It is mainly due to the possibility th...
^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...fraid of being detected or heavily fined . Bien Hoa city-one of the areas, agrees ...
^^
Line 3, column 516, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d emergency bells in many neighbourhoods , which help to reduce robbery proportion...
^^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...p to reduce robbery proportions nowadays . An area with stable security, on the ot...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, well, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26470588235 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87120063562 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639705882353 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5435643752 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.285714286 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195383491498 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585426703339 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566053877637 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098840302996 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340882636743 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.