The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003 to 2012.
The line graph gives figures for the changing rates of crime in the central city between 2003 and 2012.
All things considered, although there was a stable tendency in the number of car theft and robbery, the rate of burglary plummeted significantly, which means the inner city was under more protection.
As can be seen, there was a descending trend in the number of burglars breaking into city livers'houses. In 2004, the rate of burglary hit the top with nearly 3800 cases before sanking dramatically by 2500 incidents throughout a four-year period. From this point, the figures recovered slighly and remained under 1500 cases in the following years.
Secondly, the number of incidents in car theft and robbery fluctuated. Before reaching the bottom of 2000 incidents between 2006 and 2008, the rate of car theft remained unchanged, approximately 2900 cases. Since 2008, the number soon climbed back to the number of 2800 incidents. Unlike the two mentioned crimes, the rate of robbery in New Port city centre was quite low. Most robbers commited the crime in 2005, nearly 1000 incidents of robbery but soon fell to a low of only 500 cases in the next three years before rising again years later.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-14 | Bao Chau Phan | 61 | view |
| 2021-12-16 | CDTSON | 81 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of households in the us by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 78
- International travel is becoming cheaper and countries are opening their doors to more and more tourists Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh the disadvantages 89
- TASK 2 Students should be completely free to choose whether to study or play games They should be allowed to manage their own time Do you agree or disagree 61
- The pie charts display the proportion of key sources of energy used in the USA between 1980s and 1990s 10
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9504950495 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54341770656 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589108910891 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0204947496 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114162370381 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468482384534 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623072447134 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083731172239 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713722452501 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.