Following the September 11th attack, where the Al-Qaeda acquired bombmaking and terrorist knowledge over the internet, many lawmakers have proposed that an international body regulate the internet so that sites which provide information to terrorists could be eliminated.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the above opinion. Support your opinion with reasons and examples.
The author states that lawmakers have proposed that the internet should be regulated by an international body whose job is to remove sites that provide information to terrorists. Many lawmakers have proposed this suggestion after the terrorist attack by Al-Qaeda. Al-Qaeda learnt bombmaking and terrorist knowledge from the internet and destroyed many lives. Internet can be a boon or a curse. In this case, it was a curse. To make it a boon, there should be a regulating international body. So, I agree with the author. To support my position, I have provided the following reasons given below.
To begin with, Internet should not be the place where terrorists are encouraged for their wrongdoing or acquire their malicious skills. If an international regulating body controls all the sites, then only terrorism could be controlled. Otherwise, terrorists will have full freedom to do whatever they want on the Internet and will be successful in destroying many other lives. Terrorism needs to be controlled because it fails to show that humanity still exists. For example, like a country needs a regulationg body to control all activity inside the country(legislative helps to remove crime), Internet allso needs a body that is impartial towards all and helpsto eliminate terrorism.
Secondly, an international body that is regulating the internet will also stop many other cyber crimes and frauds. Many people are suffering because their passwords are being stolen, photos are being leaked, their money is being stolen with the help of the Internet. A regulating body can also help solve all this problems. Weapons are also beind sold illegally on the Internet which are also used for terrorism or other purposes. This can also be eliminated by the regulating body. This law can alleviate the stress of many people.
Finally, many researchers will argue that this law will eliminate some sites that are useful for their research. Because some scientists are working for the national security of their country and they want this information on the Internet. Some sites can be crypted and they can be made available to only those people who have valid credentials that are given by the regulating body. This will solve the problem of the scientists and will also not help terrorists for their harmful activities. For example, Some military sites can not be accessed by common people and only a person with valid passwords can access it. This sites are protected with high security.
To conclude, I agree with the lawmakers that proposed to have an international regulating body to eliminate sites which help in terrorism. This will help people in many ways. It will protect the people from the deleterious terrorists and will help save lives of many people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-30 | mansi_9542 | 50 | view |
- Following the September 11th attack where the Al Qaeda acquired bombmaking and terrorist knowledge over the internet many lawmakers have proposed that an international body regulate the internet so that sites which provide information to terrorists could 50
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 56
- Muscle Man Gym wants to increase women member enrollment The percentage of women who have monthly memberships is currently only 20 In order to increase the number of women members Muscle Man Gym should buy more cardiovascular equipment because women like 70
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve full freedom to do whatever they want on the Internet and will be successful i...
^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...regulating body can also help solve all this problems. Weapons are also beind sold i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2321.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 451.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14634146341 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76231698594 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.425720620843 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 739.8 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0213124714 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8928571429 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1071428571 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337020775209 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102839237388 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094860719559 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219060264306 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129309638416 0.0667264976115 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve full freedom to do whatever they want on the Internet and will be successful i...
^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...regulating body can also help solve all this problems. Weapons are also beind sold i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2321.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 451.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14634146341 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76231698594 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.425720620843 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 739.8 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0213124714 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8928571429 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1071428571 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337020775209 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102839237388 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094860719559 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219060264306 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129309638416 0.0667264976115 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.