Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work. Is this a positive or negative development?
In recent years, the emergence of various types of robots has revolutionized our lives, acting as helpful companions in both domestic and professional settings. In my opinion, I firmly believe that the proliferation of robots as our friends is a positive development due to their numerous benefits.
One significant advantage of robot companions is their ability to enhance efficiency and productivity, both at home and in the workplace. These machines are programmed to perform repetitive tasks swiftly and accurately, which frees humans from mundane responsibilities. For instance, domestic robots can assist in household chores like cleaning, cooking, and even caring for the elderly or disabled individuals. Consequently, humans have more time to focus on intellectually challenging endeavors, thus increasing overall productivity and personal growth.
Robotic friends also bring emotional support and companionship, fulfilling an essential role in today's fast-paced society. Loneliness and social isolation have become prevalent issues, particularly among the elderly and those living alone. In these cases, robots can provide constant company, offering conversations, playing games, and even providing comfort in difficult times. Research suggests that interactions with robots can positively impact mental well-being, alleviating feelings of loneliness and depression. Therefore, these mechanical companions contribute significantly to maintaining the emotional stability of individuals.
Another noteworthy benefit of robotic companions is their contribution to advancements in healthcare. Robots equipped with cutting-edge technology can assist healthcare professionals by performing delicate surgeries with precision, reducing the risk of human errors. Furthermore, these companions can monitor patients' vital signs continuously, alerting medical staff in case of emergencies. By relieving healthcare workers from repetitive tasks, robots enable them to dedicate more time to patient care, ultimately improving the quality of healthcare services.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the development and integration of various types of robots as our friends should be viewed as a positive trend.
- Some people think young people should follow the traditions of their society Others think that they should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- While people in developing countries are happier than in the past people in developed countries are less happy Why What can be learnt from this 89
- Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others What types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some people think young people should follow the traditions of their society Others think that they should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people think young people should follow the traditions of their society Others think that they should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.27540983607 5.12529762239 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33669023837 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655737704918 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.6279917674 49.4020404114 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.625 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187007829029 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572963453369 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608896601846 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118327253618 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668096957818 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.35 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.14 12.4159519038 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.77 8.58950901804 137% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 78.4519038076 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.27540983607 5.12529762239 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33669023837 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655737704918 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.6279917674 49.4020404114 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.625 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187007829029 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572963453369 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608896601846 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118327253618 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668096957818 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.35 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.14 12.4159519038 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.77 8.58950901804 137% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 78.4519038076 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.