TPO53
The reading text and lecture are both about consequenses of imposing high tax on unhealthy products like cigarettes and unhealthy food products. While the author feel that taxation on these things will benefit the society. At the same time lecture dispute all this claim made by the author and his position is that, it will make the situation more worst.
First of all, according to the reading text, high taxes on smoking item will discourage the people to doing such type of things. Article states that, eventually it will make our society more healthier and decrease the obesity rate. In contrast, the lecturer argues that, high taxation on such product will encourage the buyer to purchase low quality products. Additionally, he notes down that, it will make people more sick and unhealthy than usual.
Secondly, reading passage suggests that, it is the fair idea to punished people, who are spending their money on such unhealthy things. Writer thinks that, this type of high taxes will lower down the financial burden medical cost of that sick people. The professor is challenged this view of author and said that, this type of taxes is not account the income of the people. Moreover, the people who have lower income bear more more burden of that taxes than the person having a high income.
In the end, author believe that, taxes on the smoking item and unhealthy things will increase the income of the government by manyfold. as a result, of that government will provide more fund in the public welfare and public educations. However, the tutor points out that, because of this high taxes government will not implement those policy and government will encoutrage the people to buy to this thin
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...cigarettes and unhealthy food products. While the author feel that taxation on these ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'worst' (without 'more') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: worst
...ion is that, it will make the situation more worst. First of all, according to the read...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'healthier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: healthier
...at, eventually it will make our society more healthier and decrease the obesity rate. In contr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: more
..., the people who have lower income bear more more burden of that taxes than the person ha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'more' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: more
..., the people who have lower income bear more more burden of that taxes than the person ha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...e income of the government by manyfold. as a result, of that government will provi...
^^
Line 7, column 330, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this policy' or 'those policies'?
Suggestion: this policy; those policies
...igh taxes government will not implement those policy and government will encoutrage the peop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94444444444 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33725695244 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.5157541218 49.2860985944 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.714285714 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310690535538 0.272083759551 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126285968427 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721746774448 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214196455989 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304645815548 0.0443174109184 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.