The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graphs illustrate the population of four Asian nations citizens in proportion from 1970 to 2020, with projections for the next 10 and 20 years.
Overall, the proportion of city dwellers in four countries increases over the surveyed period with Malaysia and Indonesia being the nations with the highest figure.
There was a similarity in the percentage of city inhabitants in the Philipines and Malaysia in 1970, at approximately 30%. The two countries' figure continued to witness a slight rise of almost 20% over the next 20 years before the Philippines' population is projected to reach a peak at above 80% in 2040. Similarly, the proportion of citizens in Malaysia is expected to rise to around 55% in the same year.
Both Thailand and Indonesia experienced a growth of about 15% in the population percentage from 1970 to 2000. The proportion of people living in urban areas in Thailand reached a plateau at 30% in the next 30 years prior to being predicted to go up to just under 50% by the end of the period. Meanwhile, the figure for Indonesia is forecasted to go through a dramatic increase to roughly 60% in 2024, being the second most populated country.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-07-31 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
2024-06-01 | celine ayoub | 78 | view |
2024-03-16 | minhnhat2002 | 67 | view |
2024-03-06 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
2024-02-02 | annaalysia007 | 84 | view |
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 73
- Task 1 The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, similarly, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86567164179 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8191181323 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542288557214 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2508012711 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211073630672 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932744489719 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707566287953 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138048852112 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584907864649 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.