The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar
Self-knowledge, by definition, is being aware of ones nature; which includes sociological and psycological behaviour. Some would argue that to know one-self is to reject the familiar. But others would state that repudiation of familiar is not a cogent approach in knowing one-self. After weighing the evidence, it is certain that rejection of the familiar is not the way out in recognizing one-self.
Those who would argue that knowledge about a person is derived when such person repudiate what he or she is used to might point to the fact that indulgence in certain principles will limit the scope of such individual. This scruples serves as a guide to how a person manage affairs, how to react to circumstances, handle an impasse, behave both in formal or informal settings. However, this principles is there to guide an individual so he or she will be aware of inherent efficacy associated within.
A college student is knows more about his or her ability to comprehend rash information at a very short time by making use of the library. This student was able to figure out that quiet environment is suited for him or her because such person has previously exploited reading in a noising environment due to familiarity of such mode of learning.
Furthermore, learning to repudiate how you socialise based on the peer pressure is good so you can know what works for you and what doesn't is plausible one but not the best way to approach such. Develop more on
In conclusion, it's clear that repudiation of the familiar is not an approach to self-knowledge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-27 | Aishwarya01 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Ataraxia-m | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | BusariMoruf | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | BusariMoruf | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Gnyana | 58 | view |
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildl 47
- Technology causes more problems for modern societies than it solves 58
- The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal 55
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment 50
- Students are more responsible for their educations than are their teachers 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ledge, by definition, is being aware of ones nature; which includes sociological and...
^^^^
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...n formal or informal settings. However, this principles is there to guide an individ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ou can know what works for you and what doesnt is plausible one but not the best way t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 2235.4752809 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 265.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9320754717 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95699326762 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57358490566 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 704.065955056 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7663848635 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.818181818 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173410367097 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861843385138 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095606023916 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968351397489 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103340650368 0.0667264976115 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.