The bar chart shows the difference between boys and girls in the selection of subjects at higher education levels in Canada in the year 2009.
The bar chart compares five selection of subjects in terms of boys and girls studying at higher education levels in Canada in the year 2009. Units are measured in percent.
In general, the trend shows that boys were more interested in studying Social studies rather than Languages; meanwhile girls were more keen on studying Law courses than Engineering ones. Overall, social studies was the most studied subject for both boys and girls (about 67%).
The most popular course for female undergraduate students was Law. The percentage of girls studying Law far exceeded that of boys, with respective figures being about 37% and 26%. The proportion of female students who studied a foreign language was slightly higher than that of their male counterparts.
However, the number of male studying Social studies, medicine and engineering surpassed the percentage of female counterparts. Moreover, while around 36% of males studied social studies, only 32% of females did so. The amount of the boys studying engineering studies was twice as high as that for girls at higher education level in Canada in the year 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | vuongthaolinh | 67 | view |
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offenses are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- Some people believe that children should play outdoor games To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that children should play outdoor games To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Nowadays a lot of companies switch to open offices Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ective figures being about 37% and 26%. The proportion of female students who studi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19444444444 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57655023454 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7541614692 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264241815151 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125112530971 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.203199404148 0.0843802449381 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222615939746 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.210080399297 0.0819641961636 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.