The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes of this? What can be done to solve this problem?
As the global population rises, demands for consumer goods also increase significantly. Reportedly, this trend is posing a deadly threat to Earth’s natural habitats and negatively affecting millions of creatures on our planet, including human beings. In this essay, I will discuss the factors that contribute to retail goods’ impacts on the environment, and suggest solutions to this issue.
One of the environmental impacts of the manufacturing of items we use everyday is the alarming amount of waste from product packaging. For instance, plastic is one of the most harmful resources for the environment: a product made from plastic can take over a century to be disposed of. Still, plastic bottles, boxes and straws are still being used very widely by billions, and the amount of plastic litter is unimaginable. In addition, the toxic chemicals that are released from factories in the process of goods production can pollute the habitats of animals, especially those that live underwater. In 2012, for example, a Vietnamese factory that produces goods drilled holes to release the toxic chemicals into the ocean, polluting an entire section of sea and killing thousands of fish.
It is crucial that immediate measures be implemented to prevent and resolve this global issue. First of all, companies should be encouraged to produce eco-friendly items made from plant-based materials. In Vietnam, a lot of companies are packaging their products by using materials made from sugar cane or plants. Second of all, the government should impose stricter laws on the production of consumer goods to ensure the safety of the manufacturing process towards the environment. Lastly, schools and educational institutions should take responsibility to educate young people on the importance of protecting our planet and raise students’ awareness regarding this problem.
In conclusion, a lot of factors contribute to the damage of item production on the environment, namely toxic waste and chemicals from packaging and manufacturing processes. Nonetheless, there are many ways that this situation can be relieved, as long as everyone is willing to put in effort.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-08 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | quynhanhbuiviet | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | hieu13092006 | 61 | view |
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries Why do young people choose to do so Who will benefit more young people or the communities 73
- It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- People in many countries are spending less time with their family What are the reasons for this What problems does this cause 78
- The chart below shows the number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ts of the manufacturing of items we use everyday is the alarming amount of waste from pr...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, nonetheless, regarding, second, so, still, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46130952381 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03623799171 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568452380952 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1072331808 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227161709467 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745991459267 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411590610778 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142522389528 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403693207923 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.