many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar.
There is now an alerting phenomenon that is a plethora of products containing high sugar levels. The wider spread of those foods and drinks results in many potential health problems, such as obesity and diabetes. In my opinion, while it is undeniable to restrict the overused consuming factor by raising the product prices, I strongly believe that some other distinctive solutions should also be taken into consideration simultaneously.
Within the sedentary lifestyle of today’s office workers and the allure of tasteful sugar products, the ubiquity of sweet-taste foods and drinks has increased over the world due to the reasonable cost. The health-care issues such as obesity and diabetes are ringing the bell to awaken every individual about these unconscious behaviors. One direct useful method that could have a strong influence on each citizen is raising the product costs as we have already done with cigarette issues. Taking tax as an instance, the government should consider higher tax on consumers as well as owners’ manufacturing.
On the other side of viewpoints, raising the awareness of citizens about health problems is also beneficial in reducing the sugar over-consuming phenomenon. For instance, motivating in-house workers to do some light daily exercises or spreading the drawbacks of overuse of sugar are two fruitful ways to help people understand their recent health status and the potential risks. Additionally, corresponding to their product advertisement to captivate viewerships, some cautions and its contained ingredients should be also shown apparently.
To summarize, while being more expensive with high levels of sugar in foods and drinks is a direct way to reduce the issue of overconsuming sugar, there are some solutions, like raising awareness of residents about the drawback of overusing and about doing daily exercise, also bring more benefits in this movement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-06 | mrsaidovs@mail.ru | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-22 | ThHuong | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-05 | MEBC Class | view | |
| 2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- the diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottle 61
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l about these unconscious behaviors. One direct useful method that could have a s...
^^
Line 4, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be also shown apparently. To summarize, while being more expensive with high lev...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, if, so, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9893702343 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615646258503 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.028783346 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.0 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7272727273 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31361033344 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106040965761 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577638992868 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187886917524 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570821058089 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.