in their advertising, business nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way
Discovering new things displays the human sense of curiosity. Introducing new functions or new appearance of a product plays a significant role in touching potential customers used by various business owners nowadays. In this essay, I will show the relationship between customers’ curiosity and firms’ emphasis on the newness of products to clarify the current trend. Additionally, I firmly believe that this method of advertising has gained some benefits in development for that business particularly and for society in general.
While, in the past, our older generations typically asked for products which could meet their basic needs, such as the quantity of food, water and shelter, current ages have been looking for a higher and better quality of those needs due to the higher level of living rate. Furthermore, with the quick pace of internet development, there is a plethora of product categories which are able to satisfy the customer’s requirement, even who is the strictest one. If a company ignores the process of improvement of their goods, their brand is not only standing at the current position, but also left behind others in the intensive market competition.
On the other hand, the unceasingly competitive market also creates a fair playground in which businesses are stimulated to develop or, at least, explore new functions in their own recent products. Finding new uses of products and introducing them to the public also help us, as a whole, in the process of reducing the over-used natural resource phenomenon.
In conclusion, to meet the higher requirements and their sense of curiosity of customers, companies have to figure out the way in which to develop their products and to widely spread them to the public. Additionally, this harsh competition also leads to some positive aspects such as environmental conservation.
- Some parents give their children everything that their children ask for and accept what their children want to do Is this good for children What could be the consequences for these children when they grow up 89
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 73
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, so, while, at least, in conclusion, in general, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30169491525 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01451815979 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603389830508 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.5047939677 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.181818182 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8181818182 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297017564694 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999851667949 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522901066981 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170383717489 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283246979922 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.