The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Mobile phone has become one of the most popular piece of equipment that accompanies human’s daily routines. Yet, its usage has been frown upon due to phone users’ extreme behavior of solitude, which leads to an outcry for the prohibition of such device. In my personal viewpoint, I totally agree with this notion because of its threats to formality and risks of safety concern.
First and foremost, the ban imposed on mobile phone during formal settings is highly recommended due to its potential disturbing moments . Specifically, during such important events, when all attendants pay the utmost attention on the progression and details, a strange noise of notification from the phone would be utterly distracting, which disturbs the height of the moment and devoted concentration. Hence, a ban on phone use or a requirement of switching on silence mode would be effective in preventing such accidents. For example, during a lesson, both teacher and students are required by the school regulation to switch off their phones in order to guarantee the academic quality.
Furthermore, since mobile phones carry several notable safety hazards such as fire concern, implementation of restricting phone use is reasonably advisable. Factually, mobile phones send and receive multiple frequencies that are able to create fire. Several scientific experiments have confirmed its ignition capability. Hence, areas, which store flammable materials such as gas stations have issued a ban on phone sue to ensure the safety. As a result, ever since the introduction of the ban, reports on fire cases related to phone usage within the gas station have drastically dropped.
In conclusion, despite its convenience of mobility, mobile phones also exhibit its drawback as a disturbing source as well as safety threat, which make it reasonable to issue the ban on the use of such device in several particular places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-21 | tsln7607 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-21 | tsln7607 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-21 | tsln7607 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | Phạm Phương Uyên | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | songuyen14 | 89 | view |
- Some people think that too much money has been spent looking after repairing old buildings so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The table details the international tourist arrivals in millions in 8 countries in 2009 and 2010 and the changes in percentages Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 w 78
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life What are those problems Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns 89
- In recent years some countries have experienced rapid economic development This has resulted in much higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the country side This situation may bring some problems for the country as a whole What are these pro 73
- In recent years some countries have experienced rapid economic development This has resulted in much higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the country side This situation may bring some problems for the country as a whole What are these pro 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... due to its potential disturbing moments . Specifically, during such important eve...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34551495017 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90577017073 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617940199336 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7842588771 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.769230769 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230692372017 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893415615188 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512791547927 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141572946963 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344283933388 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.