In some countries, young people have become richer, healthier, and live longer, but they are less happy. What are the causes? What can be done to address this situation?
In several parts of the world, younger generation has had an improvement in financial, health and life expectancy; however, their rate of happiness declines. There could be numerous reasons for this phenomenal, and some solution will be needed to tackle such issue.
The decline in happiness among affluent and healthier youth may stem from several factors. To commence with, due to the fast-pace nature of modern life, charactered by intense competition or working-related stress, people’s contentment can be overshadowed. For instance, people try to work hard, even overtime working-schedule, to gain promotions at work and get more money. This makes them do not have enough time to relax and rest, consequently causes to stress and depressed. Moreover, in the increasingly development society, young people may be easier influenced by social media including unrealistic comparison and aspiration. This can make younger suffer some mental issues in long term, feelings of inadequacy and self-doubt for example.
To counter this disheartening trend, several measures can be taken. Firstly, the government as well as companies should encourage work-life balance life-style among employees. Many researches have shown that creating a harmonious work-life balance not only prevents modern employees from risk of morbidity and under enormous stress but also enhances their quality of work. Furthermore, families and schools also play a role in addressing aforementioned issue. They should teach their children how to collect the informations in the Internet, differentiate between genuine happiness and manufactured appearances, leading to a more realistic self-assessment.
To sum up, there are several reasons contributing to the trend that young people has enhanced in financial and health but become less happy. I believe that, to tackle this problem, from government to schools and families need to take step-by-step measures to empowder the younger generation to counteract the adverse effects of modern-life challenges.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-30 | MEBC Class | 100 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | QuynhAnh. | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | QuynhAnh. | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by 3 companies over a period of 15 years
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 67
- In most successful organisations some people believe that communication between managers and workers is important while other people said that other factors are more significant What is your opinion 61
- The given picture shows the process of making electricity from coal Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by 3 companies over a period of 15 years 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 455, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'stressing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: stressing
... to relax and rest, consequently causes to stress and depressed. Moreover, in the increas...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74750830565 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1751517292 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647840531561 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7393131542 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19176627255 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622784449938 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390200236492 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108722356837 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331614069263 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.