some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Many people feel that sharing the scientific, business and academic data is appropriate option, whereas others think that there should be some restriction to share them without paying. This essay discusses both sides of this argument, and then I will my own prospective.
On one side of the argument there are people who argue that the benefits of unlimited access to research consequences considerably outweigh its disadvantages. The main reason for believing this is that it might be helpful for individuals who live in less developed countries to mitigate their problems by spending less money and time. It is also possible to say that it can prevent a crisis in special cases such as medical issues and curing diseases. One good illustration of this is related to widespread illness [COVID] which has had to share the scientist's findings completely to discover the best way for saving the individual's life in all of the world.
On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that in fact some of the crucial information must be protected in a suitable way because of their value. People often have this opinion because they need to compensate their sources for continuing their research. Furthermore, some data is potentially able to be used by inappropriate people, so putting some restriction to control the access is necessary. A particularly good example here is to keep the military information on weapons. The publication of this type of information can have serious repercussions by abusive people. There are different kinds of similar samples in economic and academic fields too.
In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I feel that putting restrictions on some information like military data to limit access is obligatory. Because if the criminals have access to this information, it will lead to disaster consequences.
- leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people some people think the younger leader would be better do you agree or disagree 67
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 73
- advantages and disadvantages of the use of organic foods 84
- Nowadays more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same job What problems this causes What are the solutions 73
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 621, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...to discover the best way for saving the individuals life in all of the world. On the other...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 641, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... way for saving the individuals life in all of the world. On the other hand, it is also p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...g case. It is often argued that in fact some of the crucial information must be protected i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a suitable way" with adverb for "suitable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e crucial information must be protected in a suitable way because of their value. People often ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, then, whereas, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15434083601 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96947383166 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572347266881 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6607254978 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.1875 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275564241551 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778662466677 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509032561034 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157021200423 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539072193444 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.