Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Thesedays, scientific research and developments in many fields are very accelerated by government and industries funding. However, if anyone don’t care whatever the research is going on, we can’t predict whether the research will affect to us in a good way or bad way. To reduce this predictable problem, I think a government should place few restrictions on scientific research and development. I will suggest main two reasons why the government should watch those researches.
First, if there is no limitation, some researchs can be danger to public. Let’s imagine there is a research for experiment about nuclear physics. If a government doesn’t restrict about safety policies for the experiment, it may cause radiation leaks. It will increase any danger not only community near the experiments conducted, but also the cost to solve those problems will increase. If government restricted on such experiments for safety purpose, damages and cost of restorations will not be increased. In the case of this example, restrictions mean save our life and wealth. To diminish any hazards from scientific research, any restrictions related to public safety must be prerequisite.
Secondly, some of scientific topics are very sensitive for nations where the government consisted in. Science has no nationality but a scientist who conducts scientific research has. For instances, these days, semiconductors are very important to many countries. It is widely used in various applications so many industries and nations are depending on this technology. Because of this reason, they recognize those technologies are their own strategic resources. Therefore, the government should consider to keep their intelletuals in control.
Conclusively, restriction is important to keep scientific knowledges. It is true that a creativity is also important to developing science. However, restriction does not limit scientists’ sight of view but try to let encourage scientists along with public worth. If any scientific research cause destructive result to its community, the scientist may feel frustrated. So, government should place at least any restrictions on scientific research and development to save worth of all people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-07-01 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
- Unfortunately in contemporary society creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea 83
- People attend college or university for many different reasons for example new experiences career preparation increased knowledge Why do you think people attend college or university Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Government should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 50
- Government should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 50
- Unfortunately in contemporary society creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea 83
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[2]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'doesn’t'.
Suggestion: doesn’t
... industries funding. However, if anyone don’t care whatever the research is going on,...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 98, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...anger to public. Let’s imagine there is a research for experiment about nuclear physics. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nger to public. Let’s imagine there is a research for experiment about nuclear ph...
^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ications so many industries and nations are depending on this technology. Because of this rea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, at least, for instance, i think, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 336.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62202380952 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21490156137 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6386362544 60.3974514979 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.8636363636 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2727272727 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.501651886723 0.243740707755 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135983641569 0.0831039109588 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138665128961 0.0758088955206 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29969977727 0.150359130593 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123633236676 0.0667264976115 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.72 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[2]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'doesn’t'.
Suggestion: doesn’t
... industries funding. However, if anyone don’t care whatever the research is going on,...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 98, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...anger to public. Let’s imagine there is a research for experiment about nuclear physics. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nger to public. Let’s imagine there is a research for experiment about nuclear ph...
^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ications so many industries and nations are depending on this technology. Because of this rea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, at least, for instance, i think, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 336.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62202380952 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21490156137 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6386362544 60.3974514979 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.8636363636 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2727272727 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.501651886723 0.243740707755 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135983641569 0.0831039109588 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138665128961 0.0758088955206 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29969977727 0.150359130593 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123633236676 0.0667264976115 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.72 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.