The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Being a social animal, human beings live in groups or societies which helps them various aspects. Ranging from small societies that constitute people living together and share resources, to a country which includes people from different background, professions and mentality. To lead or to guide a society, an overseeing authority is imperetive to make sure that a society does not succumb to internal disputes and to ensure the prosperity and burgeoning of the people of the society. The prompt suggests that for the growth and well-being of a society, it is necessary that a many of its members question the authority. In my opinion, I strongly agree to the presented statement because of the following two reasons.
Firstly, there are many instances when a leader's or a governing authority's actions and decisions are mostly based on their own calculations and agenda. It is not unusal for people in power to show venality. If their decisions are more biased towards fulfiling their own agenda, rather than concerning the well-being of society, it will not be a wonder that such society is prone to an eventual doom. For instance, the recent example of Sri Lankan government where the entire country's government is controlled by a family. Moreover, the most influential positions, i.e. president and prime minister are brothers from the same family. They took a series of decisions for self-serving purposes and controlled the whole structure as per their will, which lead to ultimate economical collapse of the country. Now the most interesting thing to observe is, that the population of the country did not start questioning the government until it was too late. If their leaders were put in check from the beginning and questioned for their decisions, this kind of situation could have been prevented. Consider a scenario, if the people questioned this dictatorship hierarcy and demanded a democratic government, wouldn't the country's ultimate collapse would have been avoided?
Further, it also plays a crucial role whether a substantial number of society members are questioning the authorities or just a handful. This is highly relevant because voices of a few are easy to ignore or suppress by those who are in power. Obviously, it is much difficult for them to avert their attention when a mass is demanding answers for their doings. Consider the example of Nokia, when android entered the market, almost all the mobile phone manufacturing companies abandoned their platform and adopted android because of its promising future. Nokia on the other hand, decided to stick with windows. There have been a few reportings that during the advent of android, a handful of employees at Nokia questioned the administration against their decision to not adopt android, but their voices weren't taken seriously. Consequently, the market of Nokia mobiles have gove downhill tremendously. The above example is a perfect evidence that illustrates why it is necessary for a majority of people to question the authorities.
Of course, some could argue that if people incessantly keep questioning the autorities, wouldn't it make their job more difficult? As they would spend lots of time in just responding to the people, rather than doing their work. However, if the authorities are indeed, doing their job properly, it shouldn't be a tiring task for them to answer the members and hence they wouldn't face much of a trouble from them. A collective good and prosperity comes when those in-charge are questioned and held accountable for their actions and decisions. And the best way to ensure this is by having the society's own members question the authorities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-05 | titanite09 | 54 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | raghavchauhan619 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | priyanshu1 | 75 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | priyanshu1 | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | SamikshaVarpe | 58 | view |
- Claim Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate practical application Reason It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty 70
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 58
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority 83
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 83
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a leader' or simply 'leaders'?
Suggestion: a leader; leaders
... Firstly, there are many instances when a leaders or a governing authoritys actions and d...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1201, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...y and demanded a democratic government, wouldnt the countrys ultimate collapse would ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 803, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
... to not adopt android, but their voices werent taken seriously. Consequently, the mark...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...santly keep questioning the autorities, wouldnt it make their job more difficult? As th...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
... questioning the autorities, wouldnt it make their job more difficult? As they would...
^^^^
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...re indeed, doing their job properly, it shouldnt be a tiring task for them to answer the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 369, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...em to answer the members and hence they wouldnt face much of a trouble from them. A col...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, so, well, as to, for instance, kind of, of course, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3068.0 2235.4752809 137% => OK
No of words: 593.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.173693086 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93473315629 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85189071131 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 305.0 215.323595506 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514333895447 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 947.7 704.065955056 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1858204642 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.62962963 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.962962963 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7037037037 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282832588064 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711545386554 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662179027041 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186984783592 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702396629049 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 100.480337079 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.