Some people say that schools should teach good behavior to children and introduce them to right and wrong. Parents should not only be the ones responsible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people state that the responsibility of teaching good behavior and introducing right and wrong to children should be on the shoulders of schools and parents simultaneously. I firmly agree with this statement, and the following paragraphs will elaborate on it.
Some parts of children’s nurturing may occur outside of their home. Children spend around half of their time in school, and they interact with their school's authorities and other students while their parents are not aware of what they are doing in that time. Students may do something wrong without knowing their failures or inappropriate behaviors. Therefore, here is the role of schools to introduce them to what is the right way of manner and what part of their behavior should be improved.
In addition, sometimes families are not able to consider each aspect of their children’s behavior and cannot spend adequate time with their children to teach them these things due to having hectic lifestyles. For example, many parents should work more than 10 hours daily to meet their family's needs, and when they arrive home, they are too tired to spend time with their children. Therefore, again, schools can help these parents compensate this lack for children, and teach them beside of academic education, the other things that they may need to learn
However, some believe that schools should focus on academic education. Although academic education is important for children, appropriate behavior and knowing what is precisely right and wrong may be more crucial in their future real life.
To sum up, I strongly believe that parents are not the only ones that should nurture children what is right and wrong, and schools should teach them to behave correctly.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-11 | alpha2006sh | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some psychologists think that the best way to overcome the stress of everyday life is to spend a portion of the day doing absolutely nothing To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- All education and healthcare should be funded by the government and free for everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some psychologists think that the best way to overcome the stress of everyday life is to spend a portion of the day doing absolutely nothing To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17375886525 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58071502412 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514184397163 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.2199733803 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.636363636 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415337696723 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18542391116 0.084324248473 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1602614528 0.0667982634062 240% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288502929462 0.151304729494 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11586769382 0.056905535591 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17375886525 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58071502412 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514184397163 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.2199733803 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.636363636 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415337696723 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18542391116 0.084324248473 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1602614528 0.0667982634062 240% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288502929462 0.151304729494 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11586769382 0.056905535591 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.