While many people go to university for academic study, more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers. Do you agree or disagree?
It is thought that more people should do vocational training instead of pursuing higher education due to a lack of qualified blue-collar workers nowadays. I firmly agree with this argument because of two main reasons, which will be explained in this essay.
Chief of these is that vocational training is considered more financially suitable for many people. While tertiary education can cost a fortune, especially in the cases of renowned and prestigious universities, vocational training is more affordable. Moreover, nowadays a considerable number of college graduates are struggling with unemployment, which is a problem not commonly seen in blue-collar jobs. Workers such as plumbers or electricians can start making money right away after finishing their training, which is extremely necessary and beneficial for those who come from poor families.
Added to this, choosing vocational training could guarantee a more stable and desirable career prospect. Some might be afraid that blue-collar workers will be replaced in the near future due to the rapid development of technology, however, I am not entirely convinced by this line of reasoning. It is true that robots took the jobs of many industrial workers when they first came out decades ago, but it has been proved that they have limits and cannot obtain the flexibility and profession of a plumber or an electrician. Furthermore, what people are more increasingly concerned about is artificial intelligence, and these man-made minds are more likely to become a threat for white-collar workers instead of those who work in labor.
In conclusion, I completely support the idea of encouraging more people to do vocational training because of two main factors: financial benefit and stable future prospects.
- The bar chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the last year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people think that too much money has been spent looking after and repairing old buildings so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- There is a lot of pressure on young people today to succeed academically As a result some people believe that non academic subjects such as physical education and cookery should be removed from the school syllabus so that children can concentrate on acade 61
- Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed However others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments Can experimentation on animals be justified Are there any alternatives 84
- While many people go to university for academic study more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers Do you agree or disagree 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43272727273 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03326788293 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621818181818 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.0550603278 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.818181818 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350496304642 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119703774876 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829863334999 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212623575999 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466663374745 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43272727273 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03326788293 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621818181818 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.0550603278 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.818181818 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350496304642 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119703774876 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829863334999 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212623575999 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466663374745 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.