Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quantities of information and find what’s important.
__________
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
In this new age of mass media, especially social media, the population has never had access to so much information. At the swipe of our fingers we can go from live videos of a volcano erupting on an island in Japan to a cute video about a cat and dog friendship with 2 million views on TikTok. The amount of content that is put of the internet and other media forms is overwhelming. As a result, the modern attention span has definitely decreased from what it was a few decades ago, but this should not be viewed with the second half of the prompt as a “net positive”. We must see the issue for what it is a degradation of cognitive skills and an ability to concentrate.
As more and more children have begun to adopt technology from early ages, some as young as 2 or 3, the amount of satisfaction that can be derived from one piece of media will continue to decrease. This has to be countered from a parental aspect by limiting the amount of “screen time” that children are exposed to but this cannot be the only measure. If a society of people arise that cannot concentrate on a certain task for up to 30 minutes without becoming bored, unconcerned or whipping out their phones, to scroll through Twitter the road ahead will be rough. The negative impact this will have on research, scientific advancement and development of ideas will be profound. Assuming the positive of an enhanced ability to dive through and analyze large portions of information does not stop the detrimental effects of this change from being widespread.
The ability to extrapolate the important pieces of information from a pile of data or sources has arisen due to the enormous mountain of misinformation that has been allowed to grow. On sites such as Facebook where elections and other important matters have been swayed by mountains of bots, the information that might be deemed important could be wrong. The more important skill should be able to discern fact from fiction. On several media platforms lies are being paraded as truths and the effects have been felt in the real world. From coups to stolen elections the real issues are not being challenged. If one can swim well through muddy water to the other side of the bank, their clothes will still be dirty once emerged. Guardrails must be put in place by these platforms that curtail the endless stream of misinformation and measures must be put in place to ensure they are stopped.
Taking the prompt above at face value and seeing the net positive, the question of which is more important for human functioning can arise. Is it more important to be able to separate useless bits of information from necessary ones if you can only stay on a particular task for thirty minutes at a time? Is there a threshold that must be breached before the problem becomes more apparent? There must be conscious steps taken starting from the home, to the classroom and society at large to ensure that the eradication of cognitive function is curtailed in the nearest future. News networks and the industry that is journalism must band together and kick out the hold misinformation is taking on the minds of the populace both young and old.
The minimized attention span of the general population is not something that can be taken with a supposed positive and then viewed with rose tinted glasses. There are real issues arising from the changes in how we consume mass media and how those that package that media present it to us. Without such we can never know the positive or negative impact of any one standpoint.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-19 | Adesina Boluwatito | 58 | view |
2022-11-03 | haemanth10 | 66 | view |
2022-10-05 | asm01 | 58 | view |
2022-09-30 | anil paltya | view | |
2022-07-09 | sally_tt | 66 | view |
- In any field field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make meaningful contributions 83
- Claim Even though young people often receive the advice to follow your dreams more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals Reason Many people s dreams are inherently selfish Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or 58
- We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own 83
- In all levels of education affection should be focused first on theory in order for students to understand the concepts rather than practical s to what extent do you agree or disagree 50
- Mass media and the internet have caused people s attention spans to get shorter However the overall effect has been positive while people are less able to focus on one thing they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quan 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, still, then, well, as to, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 38.0 19.5258426966 195% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 99.0 58.6224719101 169% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2943.0 2235.4752809 132% => OK
No of words: 623.0 442.535393258 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72391653291 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.99599519102 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61910166956 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 304.0 215.323595506 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487961476726 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 927.0 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7269984542 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.72 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.92 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.68 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177779149914 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528304083774 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356594159555 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104948063081 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270753470037 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.