Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
I disagree with the claim that it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero solely because the reputation of individuals subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished. While it is true that media scrutiny can often tarnish a person's reputation, it does not preclude the possibility of heroism or admiration for individuals.
First, it is important to acknowledge that heroism is a complex and multifaceted concept. Heroes are often celebrated for their courage, selflessness, and positive impact on society. The actions and qualities that make someone a hero are not solely dependent on their reputation in the media. Heroes can be found in many different spheres, including everyday life, and their heroic acts can sometimes transcend the influence of media scrutiny.
Furthermore, the claim assumes that media scrutiny is always detrimental to a person's reputation. While it is true that the media can focus on negative aspects or expose flaws, it can also highlight individuals' positive contributions to society. Media can be a powerful tool for raising awareness of important causes and showcasing the actions of heroic individuals who have made a significant difference in the world.
The reason behind the claim oversimplifies the nature of media and the way society perceives heroism. It is essential to remember that society has a choice in how it regards and celebrates heroes. Society can choose to focus on the positive aspects of an individual's actions and recognize their contributions, even if their reputation has been negatively impacted by media scrutiny.
In conclusion, while media scrutiny can affect a person's reputation, it does not eliminate the possibility of society regarding someone as a hero. Heroism is not solely determined by media coverage but by the individual's actions and their impact on the world. It is up to society to make a conscious effort to celebrate and recognize the heroes among us, even in the face of media scrutiny.
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree o 58
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 50
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...that media scrutiny can often tarnish a persons reputation, it does not preclude the po...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...on in the media. Heroes can be found in many different spheres, including everyday life, and t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...dia scrutiny is always detrimental to a persons reputation. While it is true that the m...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 50, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...sion, while media scrutiny can affect a persons reputation, it does not eliminate the p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, regarding, so, while, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 326.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24846625767 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02531287177 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463190184049 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 563.4 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3299998512 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.066666667 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256087548629 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097467255813 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106732404283 0.0758088955206 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169655536139 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110916394499 0.0667264976115 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.