Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behavior. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences.
Discus both these views and give your own opinion.
There are two main ideas that people who visit to other countries either should follow local customs and behavior or the host country should welcome cultural differences. I think both of them are good based on counties situations.
Some countries because of their region cannot allow foreign tourists to visit their countries without any restriction and visitors have to follow their rules. It might make hard many things for visitors to do. Although these rules have a positive aspect in one side and it is kept them believe alive, in negative aspect make loss visitors and tourists especially in countries which their financial related to tourists and visitors. The most of countries that have many limitations provide an especial space which tourists can easy their and there is not any restriction on there. This is a good legislate that pay attention more than before.
Some other countries do not have any limitation to visit them. It makes tourists have more tendency to visit such countries and get familiar with them. It is an innovative idea that governments should implement. This makes the host people get familiar with other cultures and traditional. Not only is a financial support for governments but also, they can attract different culture to know them and vise versa. The countries without any restriction can improve relationship between different cultures, even most of them welcome if you want to investment on their countries. There are a lot of different places that provide to an especial tourists such as chines restaurants, chines locals and etc.
Totally, both sides have advantages and disadvantages. The governments should rule which help to their countries promote.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-11-05 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
2022-01-21 | sinanarimani | 78 | view |
2021-04-04 | sattar_iust | 84 | view |
2021-01-24 | alinabizada | 78 | view |
2020-11-08 | hiva farahani | 73 | view |
- the pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 73
- the graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predications for 2030 and 2040
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 437, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the countries') or simply say ''most countries''.
Suggestion: most of the countries; most countries
...l related to tourists and visitors. The most of countries that have many limitations provide an e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 639, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'tourist'?
Suggestion: tourist
...rent places that provide to an especial tourists such as chines restaurants, chines loca...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 690, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ch as chines restaurants, chines locals and etc. Totally, both sides have advantages a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 698, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ines restaurants, chines locals and etc. Totally, both sides have advantages and ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20072992701 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67472437101 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529197080292 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.4638450152 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0625 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1875 7.06120827912 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309790925684 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103226170813 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105713556017 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226928185187 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134157743148 0.056905535591 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.