Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the context that science has become one of the top-tier concerns of each nation, a school of thought holds that scientific projects should be conducted and governed by national institutions rather than private organizations. From my perspective, I concur with this assertion as two main reasons related to budget and management problems which will be elaborated on in this essay.
To commence with, with national taxes, governments outweigh private firms in ensuring a sound financial source for high-costing scientific studies. Indeed, executing such projects involves a huge amount of money invested in from facilities and equipment to educational programs training talents in this field. Moreover, scientific projects last even several years and are likely to have uncertain results. Therefore, if responsibility is assigned to private companies, they may suffer from bankruptcy when such projects end in failure (fail). To illustrate, in the US, most civil space programs, aeronautics research, and space research are conducted effectively by NASA which is a United States federal government agency.
In addition, other aspects worth mentioning are safety and social development to prove that scientific studies should undergo vigorous administration by national authorities instead of independent firms. First and foremost, with the community-oriented mission, governments always prioritize their citizens’ safety so scientific research is controlled strictly about quality and facilities. For instance, nuclear experiments can cause radiation leaks and affect human health, even being passed down through generations while high-standard infrastructure construction costs a fortune so only governments can undertake it. Secondly, scientific achievements should serve a public purpose while private companies tend to make use of them for commercial interests. As a result, only the prosperous can access scientific betterment while the rest of the world live in backward condition leading to an unequal society.
In conclusion, it has been argued that governments should be responsible for scientific research and I side with this opinion as this facilitates certainty in investment cost and prevents side-effects regarding security and equal social development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-18 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-15 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-15 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
- It is a natural process of animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos etc There is no reason why people should stop this from happening Do you agree or disagree 73
- More people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- The graph shows the average daily sales of selected food items at the Vista cafe by season Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the average daily sales of selected food items at the Brisk Caf by season Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94817073171 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19605128683 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664634146341 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.4744963506 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.076923077 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2307692308 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205667365155 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676347174326 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483411473443 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122752037341 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210754841492 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.53 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.