The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel’s customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010.
The pie charts compare the percentages of visitors rated the Parkway Hotel’s customer service in two distinct years 2005 and 2010.
It is clear that the percentages of excellent and good responses from visitors increased significantly over the period of 5 years. By contrast, the numbers of the hotel’s guests who rated satisfactory or lower dropped considerably.
In 2005, there was a small number of guests to the Parkway Hotel felt excellent or good about the customer service of the hotel, the figures were just 5% and 14% respectively. Over the following 5 years, this numbers rose dramatically to 28% and 39%.
By contrast, we can see that the percentages of the other three levels of visitors’ satisfaction fell. It is noticeable that the proportion of the hotel’s guests thought customer service very poor dropped from 15% in 2005 to only 4% in 2010. The figures for satisfactory and poor also decreased to 17% and 12% respectively.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
2023-11-08 | Daniel3003 | 78 | view |
2023-11-08 | Daniel3003 | 60 | view |
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up to the minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts 56
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish 73
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish 84
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 61
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 157 200
No. of Characters: 759 1000
No. of Different Words: 88 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.54 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.834 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.901 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 51 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 44 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 28 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.625 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.143 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.125 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.453 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.453 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.105 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 4