In some cultures children are taught by their parents that they can achieve anything with hard work. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend?
In various cultures, parents impart the belief that their children can attain any goals through diligent and hard-working characteristics. I will consider how this view brings several notable advantages, which I will elucidate in the following paragraphs.
Regarding the merits, we must acknowledge that instilling discipline and persistent characters during childhood period reflects the values of hard work perceived by parents. When they simultaneously encourage diligent task completion, children not only learn effective time management but also embrace failure-tolerant perspective as Scandinavian countries fully engage their young generation in it. Furthermore, this principle enhances children’s creativity requiring their critical-thinking, problem-solving and decision-making skills, ultimately elevating cognitive ability along with conclusive goals. Greta Thunberg, a young activist known for her dedication to environmental issues as a real-life inspiring youth achieving meaningful purposes and positive changes.
By contrast, we must elucidate the various demerits of this issue that ingraining a success through strong work ethic since childhood period disrupt youth life, causing a lack of harmony between academic achievement and social development. In Chinese families, the trend of nerd culture inflicts unhappy and unfriendly children with low self-esteem, thus defecting socialization. Moreover, constant parental pressure significantly jeopardizes the psychological well-being of youngsters, in which this leads to identity crisis and mental issues. These challenges are illustrated by recent studies of British Journal of Psychiatry about a noticeable surge in Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) cases among Canadian children.
In conclusion, while some may perceive potentially drawbacks to certain respects, I would argue that achieving any goals through perseverance principle for children can be substantially significant. Those include nurturing survival skills as well as enhancing cognitive ability.
- In many countries people like to eat more food from other regions than can be grown in a local area As a result much of the food has to come from other regions Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 89
- People believe famous people s support towards international aid organisations draws attention to the problem while other think celebrities make the problem less important Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- The bar charts illustrate the average house expenses in England and its capital city London and to present the comparison regarding the average house prices between distinct areas of England within the year 2013 84
- Some people believe that when designing a building the most important thing to be considered is the function rather than the outward appearance To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Most countries want to improve standard of living through economic development however others think social value is lost as a result Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l elucidate in the following paragraphs. Regarding the merits, we must acknowledg...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.56088560886 5.12529762239 128% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47987109908 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.745387453875 0.561755894193 133% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 130.614785619 49.4020404114 264% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 197.555555556 106.682146367 185% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1111111111 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1111111111 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267085983822 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921666806882 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596236504664 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141374370022 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300962248502 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.5 13.0946893788 187% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 15.65 50.2224549098 31% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.3001002004 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 21.36 12.4159519038 172% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 12.29 8.58950901804 143% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 9.78957915832 220% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l elucidate in the following paragraphs. Regarding the merits, we must acknowledg...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.56088560886 5.12529762239 128% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47987109908 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.745387453875 0.561755894193 133% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 130.614785619 49.4020404114 264% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 197.555555556 106.682146367 185% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1111111111 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1111111111 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267085983822 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921666806882 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596236504664 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141374370022 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300962248502 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.5 13.0946893788 187% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 15.65 50.2224549098 31% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.3001002004 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 21.36 12.4159519038 172% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 12.29 8.58950901804 143% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 9.78957915832 220% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.