The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher

Essay topics:

The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line chart compares the percentage of household with electrical appliances and the number of hours of housework per week of these household in the period of 100 years.
It is clear that the number of households uses refrigerator and vacuum cleaner increased significantly leading to the amount of time spent on doing housework in households decreased considerably between 1920 and 2019.
Looking at the percentage of households with electrical equipment, in 1920, we can see that only 30% of families has vacuum cleaner and 40% of households has washing machine, while there is no households using refrigerator in that year. However, over the following 40 years, the number of families that use fridge increased to 90% and figures for washing machine and vacuum cleaner were 70%. By 2019, all households have had at least one refrigerator and one vacuum cleaner in their houses, and only 72% of families owns washing machine.
We can also see that the number of hours of housework per week per household decreased dramatically, from 50% in 1920 to 20% in 1960. This figure fluctuated slightly over the following 40 years and eventually fell to only 10% in 2019.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-21 nobitaa 89 view
2024-08-21 nobitaa 89 view
2023-11-29 Daniel3003 73 view
2023-05-01 huyen_duong 67 view
2023-05-01 huyen_duong 73 view
Essays by user Daniel3003 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no households'?
Suggestion: there are no households
...f households has washing machine, while there is no households using refrigerator in that year. Howeve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, while, at least

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03608247423 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82203666799 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525773195876 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.9981446733 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.571428571 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189484765271 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971863793014 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721138754336 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13855387947 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617252641817 0.0819641961636 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.